Debunking Misinformation and Communicating Critical Events in Vaccine Trials

Experimental Evidence on Vaccination Intentions in SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic

Authors

  • Paula Memenga Department of Journalism and Communication Research, Hanover University of Music, Drama, and Media Germany https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5067-0430
  • Sarah Eitze Department of Media and Communication Science, University of Erfurt, Germany https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6542-9359
  • Parichehr Shamsrizi Division of Infectious Diseases, 1st Department of Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department for Clinical Immunology of Infectious Diseases, Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine, Hamburg, Germany https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0376-0967
  • Marylyn M. Addo Division of Infectious Diseases, 1st Department of Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department for Clinical Immunology of Infectious Diseases, Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine, Hamburg, Germany
  • Cornelia Betsch Department of Media and Communication Science, University of Erfurt, Germany

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47368/ejhc.2022.204

Keywords:

vaccine confidence, vaccination intention, willingness to participate in a vaccine trial, misinformation, debunking

Abstract

Misinformation and media reports about critical events in vaccine trials challenge public confidence in Covid-19 vaccine safety. Three online experiments using 2×2 between-subjects designs examined the impact of vaccine type, misinformation debunking, and critical events during vaccine trials. In Experiment 1, N = 984 participants received information about different vaccines and misinformation was debunked. In Experiment 2, N = 1,018 participants were informed about different vaccines and trial discontinuation. In Experiment 3, N = 1,006 participants received information about discontinuation and questionable research practices of a manufacturer. The main dependent variables were confidence in vaccine safety, vaccination intention, and willingness to participate in a vaccine trial. Debunking increased vaccination intention and confidence (both η2p = .01) which was partly higher for classical than for new vaccines (η2p  = .01). Information about discontinuation had no effect, but having heard about it before had benefits. Information about questionable research practices decreased confidence ( η2p = .01) and vaccination intention ( η2p = .02) regarding the target vaccine but did not affect other vaccines. Confidence (β = .47) was most strongly associated with willingness to participate in vaccine trials. Critical events in vaccine trials should be communicated transparently to increase confidence, trial participation, and vaccination intentions.

Downloads

Published

22.09.2022

How to Cite

Memenga, P., Eitze, S., Shamsrizi, P., Addo, M. M., & Betsch, C. (2022). Debunking Misinformation and Communicating Critical Events in Vaccine Trials: Experimental Evidence on Vaccination Intentions in SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic. European Journal of Health Communication, 3(2), 64–96. https://doi.org/10.47368/ejhc.2022.204