Sensible Use(rs) and the Construction of Self-Identity in Research Interviews
A Qualitative Exploration of how Middle-Aged and Older Adults Search for and Use Online Health Information
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47368/ejhc.2021.203Keywords:
online health information, self-identity, impression management, third-person effect, middle-aged, older adults, BelgiumAbstract
As a much-used data collection method in qualitative research, interviewing is a primary way to make sense of social life. However, critics point out that interviews are often used uncritically and unreflectively, without considering epistemological foundations and self-presentation efforts by interviewees. By way of a two-step, theory-driven qualitative thematic analysis, this study examines how Belgian middle-aged and older adults (51-79 years old) construct their self-identity in research interviews as sensible internet users with regards to online health information (OHI) and their motivations for doing so. The findings are underpinned by a theoretical framework which enhances impression management (IM) theory with the third-person effect (TPE). The study finds that respondents engage in various IM behaviours, including instances of the TPE, to maximise positive impressions and minimise negative impressions. Through IM, interviewees 1) respond to critical questions; 2) proactively demonstrate knowledge, accomplishments, and positive outcomes; 3) compare and distance oneself from others; and 4) communicate limitations and offer external explanations. The findings contribute to the scant literature on IM in research interviews and among older adults and carry various implications for the field of health communication and beyond, such as the importance of critically reflecting on interviewing and going beyond the face value of the data.
References
Antonopoulos, N., Veglis, A., Gardikiotis, A., Kotsakis, R., & Kalliris, G. (2015). Web third-person effect in structural aspects of the information on media websites. Computers in Human Behavior, 44, 48-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.022
Atkinson, P., & Silverman, D. (1997). Kundera’s immortality: The interview society and the invention of the self. Qualitative Inquiry, 3(3), 304-325. https://doi.org/10.1177/107780049700300304
Bolino, M. C., Kacmar, K. M., Turnley, W. H., & Gilstrap, J. B. (2008). A multi-level review of impression management motives and behaviors. Journal of Management, 34(6), 1080-1109. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308324325
Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Sage.
Davison, W. P. (1983). The third-person effect in communication. Public Opinion Quarterly, 47(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1086/268763
DeLorme, D. E., Huh, J., & Reid, L. N. (2006). Perceived effects of direct-to-consumer (DTC) prescription drug advertising on self and others: A third-person effect study of older consumers. Journal of Advertising, 35(3), 47-65. https://doi.org/10.2753/JOA0091-3367350304
DeLorme, D. E., Huh, J., & Reid, L. N. (2007). “Others are influenced, but not me”: Older adults’ perceptions of DTC prescription drug advertising effects. Journal of Aging Studies, 21(2), 135-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2006.06.001
Dijkstra, W., Smit, J. H., & Comijs, H. C. (2001). Using social desirability scales in research among the elderly. Quality and Quantity, 35(1), 107-115. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004816210439
Donovan, E. E., Miller, L. E., & Goldsmith, D. J. (2014). “Tell me about a time when...”: Studying health communication through in-depth interviews. In B. B. Whaley (Ed.), Research methods in health communication: Principles and application (pp. 21-40). Routledge.
DuBrin, A. J. (2011). Impression management in the workplace: Research, theory, and practice. Routledge.
Ellis, A. P. J., West, B. J., Ryan, A. M., & DeShon, R. P. (2002). The use of impression management tactics in structured interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(6), 1200-1208. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1200
Eysenbach, G., & Köhler, C. (2002). How do consumers search for and appraise health information on the world wide web? Qualitative study using focus groups, usability tests, and indepth interviews. British Medical Journal, 324(7337), 573-577. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.324.7337.573
Fastame, M. C., & Penna, M. P. (2012). Does social desirability confound the assessment of self-reported measures of well-being and metacognitive efficiency in young and older adults? Clinical Gerontologist, 35(3), 239-256. https://doi.org/10.1080/07317115.2012.660411
Franz, R. L., Baecker, R., & Truong, K. N. (2018). “I knew that, I was just testing you”: Understanding older adults’ impression management tactics during usability studies. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing (TACCESS), 11(3), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1145/3226115
Gioaba, I., & Krings, F. (2017). Impression management in the job interview: An effective way of mitigating discrimination against older applicants? Frontiers in Psychology, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00770
Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Doubleday.
Gubrium, J. F., & Holstein, J. A. (2012). Narrative practice and the transformation of interview subjectivity. In J. F. Gubrium, J. A. Holstein, A. B. Marvasti, & K. D. McKinney (Eds.), Handbook of interview research (2nd ed., pp. 27-44). Sage.
Hammersley, M. (2003). Recent radical criticism of interview studies: Any implications for the sociology of education? British Journal of Sociology of Education, 24(1), 119-126. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425690301906
Heaton, J. (2004). Reworking qualitative data. Sage.
Huisman, M., Joye, S., & Biltereyst, D. (2019). Searching for health: Doctor Google and the shifting dynamics of the middle-aged and older adult patient–physician relationship and interaction. Journal of Aging and Health, 32(9), 998-1007. https://doi.org/10.1177/0898264319873809
Johnson, J. D. & Case, D. O. (2012). Health information seeking. Peter Lang.
Lee, H., & Park, S-A. (2016). Third-person effect and pandemic flu: The role of severity, self-efficacy method mentions, and message source. Journal of Health Communication, 21(12), 1244-1250. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2016.1245801
Mann, S. (2016). The research interview: Reflective practice and reflexivity in research processes. Palgrave Macmillan.
Martin, K. A., Leary, M. R., & Rejeski, W. J. (2000). Self-presentational concerns in older adults: Implications for health and well-being. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 22(3), 169-179. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324834BASP2203_5
Nettleton, S., Burrows, R., & O’Malley, L. (2005). The mundane realities of the everyday lay use of the internet for health, and their consequences for media convergence. Sociology of Health & Illness, 27(7), 972-992. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2005.00466.x
Perloff, R. M. (2009). Mass media, social perception, and the third person effect. In J. Bryant & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 252-268). Routledge.
Ray, J. J. (1988). Lie scales and the elderly. Journal of Personality and Individual Differences, 9(2), 417-418. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(88)90106-7
Schlenker, B. R. (1980). Impression management: The self-concept, social identity, and interpersonal relations. Brooks/Cole.
Schlenker, B. R. (2011). Self-presentation. In M. R. Leary & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (2nd ed., pp. 492-518). Guilford Press.
Stavrositu, C. D., & Kim, J. (2014). Social media metrics: Third-person perceptions of health information. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 61-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.02.025
Tal-Or, N., Tsfati, Y., & Gunther, A. C. (2009). The influence of presumed media influence: Origins and implications of the third-person perception. In R. L. Nabi & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of media processes and effects (pp. 99-112). Sage.
Tan, S. S., & Goonawardene, N. (2017). Internet health information seeking and the patient-physician relationship: A systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 19(1), Article e9. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.5729
Tedeschi, J. T., & Riess, M. (1981). Identities, the phenomenal self, and laboratory research. In J. T. Tedeschi (Ed.), Impression management and social psychological research (pp. 3-22). Academic Press.
Uziel, L. (2010). Rethinking social desirability scales: From impression management to interpersonally oriented self-control. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(3), 243-262. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610369465
Wei, R., Lo, V. H., & Lu, H. Y. (2008). Third-person effects of health news: Exploring the relationships among media exposure, presumed media influence, and behavioral intentions. American Behavioral Scientist, 52(2), 261-277. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764208321355
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Martijn Huisman, Eduard Cuelenaere, Stijn Joye, Daniël Biltereyst
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors agree to the following license and copyright agreement:
a. Authors retain copyright in their work.
b. Authors grant the European Journal of Health Communication the right of first publication online on the internet (on the publication platform HOPE of the Main Library of the University of Zurich).
c. The electronic contributions on the internet are distributed under the „Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International“- License (CC BY 4.0). This license allows others to copy and redistribute the work in any medium or format, to remix, transform and build upon the material with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in the European Journal of Health Communication . These conditions are irrevocable. The full text of the license may be read under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
d. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of their work, as long as the conditions of the CC BY 4.0 License are fulfilled and initial publication in the European Journal of Health Communication is acknowledged.
e. Authors grant the Editors commercial rights, using a publishing house, to produce hardcopy volumes of the journal for sale to libraries and individuals, as well as to integrate the manuscript, its title, and its abstract in databases, abstracting and indexing services, and other similar information services.
f. This agreement is subject to possible legal disclosure obligations.
g. This agreement is governed by Swiss law. Court of jurisdiction is Zürich.
